welcome unknown
history
sinking
stories
facts


gallery

community


resources

achtung!

   
 
TOPICS OF DEBATE
Controversy, Provocation and Unanswered Questions

What do you think about the questions posed below?  If you'd like to contribute a comment, send an e-mail.  We'll summarize and publish results regularly.  If you have another topic of debate you'd like to add, let us know too!

 

Was the Gustloff truly built as a troop transport ship in preparation for Hitler's military campaigns of World War II?  Some have claimed that the ship was intended for conversion as a military troop transport for Hitler's WWII agenda.  This is unlikely as its top speed was 15.5 knots (slow by other standards).  More than likely, Hitler may have had KdF vessels like the Wilhelm Gustloff and Robert Ley in mind for hospital ship duty when the need arose.  It seems an unlikely coincidence that both of these specific ships had been "outfitted with remarkably complete medical facilities" according to Philip Dawson's detailed book - Cruise Ships.
Response: Regardless whether Hitler had ships from his KdF fleet in mind for wartime duties, the Wilhelm Gustloff was critical to pre-war objectives of the Nazi government.  It was a critical propaganda tool aimed at the German public (and world) to ensure widespread acceptance of the National Socialism and raise the average German's perceived standard of living while re-armament was implemented.  For the most detailed and thorough look at the role of the KdF, procure Shelley Baranowski's terrific book Strength through Joy: Consumerism and Mass Tourism in the Third Reich  (Cambridge University Press, 2004).

 
This picture has surfaced, claiming to be a rare colour photograph of the Gustloff docked in Oslo or Gotenhafen.  Here's the problem:  The Gustloff only docked in Oslo as a hospital ship - in which case it would have had a hospital ship paint scheme.  In Gotenhafen, it would have been in its hospital ship or naval scheme.  This photo clearly shows the ship in all-white cruise paint.  Where and when was it actually taken?
Response: A large version of this photo appears in Heinz Schön's book SOS Wilhelm Gustloff.  Upon close inspection, you are able to see the faint outline of what was once the green stripe around its hull.   Thanks to comments from Martin Cahill, we can see that the Gustloff is more permanently docked, due to the presence of a semi-permanent wooden platform with sentry boxes.  Therefore, this photo was most likely taken very early in the Gustloff's career as U-boat barracks in Gotenhafen - after the hospital ship markings were removed, but before the naval grey paint was applied - perhaps December 1940/January 1941. 

 

If Alexander Marinesko had not been at risk of court martial over his “monumental bender” back in Turku, would he have dared venture so close to German activity in the Bay of Danzig?  Would the Gustloff have successfully completed its journey to Kiel?

 

 

If the 900 U-boat personnel on board the Gustloff had reached the base in Kiel and its advanced “Type 21” submarines, would the outcome of the war have been different?

Response: Most comments we've received agree that the new submarines would have had little effect on the outcome of the war.  Although the submarines were the most advanced of their time, the Battle of the Atlantic had been won by the Allies.  Phill Massaad of Sydney Australia writes "...if the Type 21 U-Boat came into service in 1943 it would have effected the outcome of the war, if it had entered service during D-Day, it might have complicated operations but would not have saved Germany from defeat".

 

Did David Frankfurter act alone when he assassinated Gustloff?

 

 

If the Wilhelm Gustloff had been named the Adolf Hitler (as originally planned), would it be a higher profile historical disaster?

Response: Here's some comments by Phill Massaad of Sydney, Australia: "Assuming Hitler agreed to have the ship named after himself then, Yes - the ship would serve as a personification of Nazi Propaganda and perhaps had a higher profile.  Hitler was very superstitious and also irrational.  In 1940 he ordered the name of the Battleship Deutschland changed as he couldn't bear the thought of having a ship bearing that name sink.  ...  Let's assume that war started and the 'Adolf Hitler' was not renamed, then I think the ship would have made a lucrative target for British & American bombers. It would have been great propaganda value to sink the 'Adolf Hitler'."

 

all contents © 2007 wilhelmgustloff.com

no part of this website may be reproduced without permission