|
THE
UNKNOWN DISASTER:
The
torpedoing of the Wilhelm Gustloff by the Russian submarine
S-13
resulted in over 9,000 tragic deaths – a staggering
figure by any comparison.
Heartbreakingly, estimates have indicated that up to half of those who
perished were children. Furthermore,
examination of history
and facts surrounding the Gustloff
provide drama rivaling any award-winning movie or book ever made.
However,
ask most people to name the greatest ship disaster in
history and you’ll usually get a response that inevitably
includes
the Titanic (which is then usually dismissed as
being too obvious). Other suggestions will be offered
like the Lusitania, Empress of Ireland, USS Arizona, Andrea Doria, etc.
Depending
on where you live in the world, the ship names may be
different - with the probable exception of the Titanic
due to its profile. Rarely will the Gustloff
(or indeed other German ships evacuating the Bay of Danzig/Gdansk
in early 1945) be among them. Why?
Perhaps
in the years to come, the Wilhelm Gustloff will be
seen as much more than a footnote in history.
In the meantime, many suggestions have been made as
to why it is largely an “untold story” today.
Here are some in no particular order:
1)
Occurred
during wartime
Many
view wartime disasters as less “tragic” than those
occurring during peacetime.
Perhaps it is because those trapped in a wartime
environment should expect the potential for danger.
2)
Happened
to the “losing” side
Quite
simply, since the dawn of time the “losing” side of
any war suffers a loss of historical documentation and
profile of their own events – even tremendously tragic
ones.
3)
German
war-guilt has repressed the disaster
Over
the last 60 years, numerous Germans have felt war-guilt
for their country’s role in WWII.
Many would have hesitated to mourn, lest they be
accused of equating German suffering with Nazi atrocities.
There are signs that enough time and healing have passed in
Germany
for proper acknowledgement of this tragedy.
Günter Grass’ tremendous book – “Crabwalk”
– deals with this issue in a sophisticated and coherent
manner.
4)
Russian
retribution for Nazi occupation
When the Nazis broke their pact with Stalin and invaded
Soviet Russia in 1941, their tactics were often brutal and
cold. Hitler himself
made it clear that this was a war different from that
waged in the West. He called it a "war of
extermination". When
the tide eventually turned and the Soviets were
marching toward Berlin, the Red Army had no mercy – and exacted horrific
revenge. Since
the Soviets were the only Allies in control of the Bay of Danzig
both near the end of the war and for many years
after, they were not about to mourn the loss of life on
any enemy ship.
5)
World
sentiment regarding Nazi atrocities
As
the world learned more about Nazi war-crimes and
systematic genocide - above all the Holocaust, subdued
global reaction to a disaster on this scale is
understandable. Under
other circumstances, 4,000 innocent children dying in a
single disaster would certainly be mourned by almost
anyone in a “friendly” or “enemy” nation.
6)
Ship
was named for a prominent Nazi leader
Wilhelm
Gustloff was leader of the Nazi Party (NSDAP) in Switzerland
before his assassination.
One wonders if the profile of this sinking might
have been higher if the ship had been named after a city
or non-Nazi figure. Ironically,
the ship was originally to be called the Adolf
Hitler, which may have repressed this
disaster even more.
7)
Soviet
Submarine S-13 Captain Alexander Marinesko
Had
a different submarine with a different captain sunk the Gustloff,
the story may have received a much higher profile in the
Soviet Union. Unfortunately for Marinesko, his
reputation and indiscretions on land made his
character incompatible with the Soviet ideal. His
reputation was eventually resurrected many years later by
the Soviet Government, but only as a hero who sunk a
fascist ship filled with military personnel only.
8)
Demise
of so many refugees (mostly women and children)
For
months, the disaster remained largely unreported both
inside and outside Germany. Inside the
imploding Nazi-Germany, Hitler wanted to suppress
awareness about the death of so many (especially occurring
on what once had been the flagship of the KdF and symbol
of unity among the German Volk).
With the western Allies, it would not have made for
a popular news story involving the deaths of so many women
and children.
9)
There
is no “American” connection or “
Hollywood
”
profile
Since
comparisons are inevitable, we can see how the Titanic profile was raised even higher worldwide with an
Academy-Award winning movie from Hollywood. Unlike the Titanic,
the Gustloff was not sailing toward America, nor did it have any American passengers on its decks.
This may very well change in the near future as
more learn about the scope of this tragedy, and the
incredible story that surrounds it.
10) No
world-renowned celebrities or citizens were on board
at the time of the disaster
In another inevitable comparison
to the Titanic, none of the Gustloff passengers
on the fateful voyage were "rich", "world famous"
or of "society's elite". Most were refugees
simply trying to escape a terrible situation.
Do
you have any relevant information regarding this
tragedy? If
you are aware of any fruitful resources that will help us learn
more, please contact
us.
|